Followers of prop 8 disagreed the weddings should be recognized. Today's opinion, penned by Chief Justice Ronald M. George for a 6-to-1 majority, announced that same-sex couples still have the legal right to civil unions, which gives them the facility to select one's life partner and enter with that person into a committed, officially recognized, and protected family relationship that enjoys all the constitutionally based situations of marriage. But the justices related the citizens had obviously voiced their will to restrict the ritual of wedding to opposite-sex couples. Justice George wrote that Offer eight failed to wholly repeal or revoke a right to such a protected relationship, but disagreed that it carves out a narrow and limited exception to these state constitutional rights, reserving the official designation of the term 'marriage' for the union of opposite-sex couples as a matter of state constitutional law. The eighteen thousand existing unions can stand, he wrote, because Offer eight failed to include language particularly claiming it was retroactive. Heated reaction to the call started right away, with protestors obstructing traffic near the court, and recommends for same-sex wedding beginning plans for another election. In L. A.
Jennifer Pizer, the Wedding Project Director for Lambda Legal, announced the decision places it to us to patch up the damage at the ballot box. One of the state's biggest gay rights groups, Equality California, sent an e-mail message to fans pleading for contributions to raise $500,000 toward a huge campaign to put an initiative on the ballot and win..


No comments:
Post a Comment